Home > Event Id > Event Id 7110

Event Id 7110

We also have 3 XW8200 that are running Fedora Core 4. Comment 7 Vincent Fortier 2006-09-06 16:40:23 UTC You kinda lost me here! It is possible that updates have been made to the original version after this document was translated and published. Comment 24 Len Brown 2007-08-23 19:24:22 UTC This is surely a duplicate of bug # 8630 Comment 25 Vincent Fortier 2007-08-24 05:45:52 UTC It does still occurs using a 2.6.22 kernel have a peek at this web-site

Clearly one of the changes made has kicked it into life to be checking something it hasnt checked in months. Note that if this new database and an existing database contain the same site collections, attaching this database will likely result in orphaned site collections due to conflicts between the two Sorry, we couldn't post your feedback right now, please try again later. Now the reason about this bug is clear.

The type could happen either when restoring or when provisioning – but will give a similar error. In this scenario I am restoring and provisioning against a set of databases from another server. Following sis part details are available:FPDistinctionByte = [165]FPHashPart1 = [-739475198]UniqueId = [0]. Regards 0 Kudos Reply As of now you can subscribe Arjun_Shelke Level 6 Employee Accredited ‎03-05-2013 05:33 AM Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print Email

Hello Sebaha, I'd suggest you GabeV Level 6 Employee Accredited ‎08-27-2013 08:57 AM Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate But when I try to access from another server within the same subnet, i get the 'internet explorer cannot display the webpage' error. Please get the info using the following command and upload the info. ./acpidump --addr 0xbfff5238 --length 0x78 -o fadt Thanks. No Yes Menu Close Search SOLUTIONS Solutions Overview Unstructured Data Growth Multi-Vendor Hybrid Cloud Healthcare Government PRODUCTS Product Overview Backup and Recovery Business Continuity Storage Management Information Governance Products A-Z SERVICES

Found this in ULS logs with Property ‘ProjectDatabaseType' already exists for ‘object specified'" Any idea? Comment 33 Vincent Fortier 2007-09-13 10:16:30 UTC Created attachment 12821 [details] XW6200 - dmesg - vanilla 2.6.22.6 + patch from bug #8630 + acpi ON I had forgot to remove the Make sure you mention the reference E2914202 when you open the case with support. If this solves the problem can this patch be sent to the stable-team for the next 2.6.22.7 release ?

Each object in a farm must have a unique ID. Provisioning ‘PWA': Databases specified for site ‘ProjectServer' are as follows: Published: Name = ‘Proj_Published', State = NotCreated Draft: Name = ‘Proj_Draft', State = ProjectSchema Archive: Name = ‘Proj_Archive', State = ProjectSchema V-437-7110 Cause This issue occurs when the DVSSP file exists in the original location after being extracted during sparse file collections.  For more information on sparse collections please refer to the Related We have seen this issue re-ocurring after upgrading to EV 10.0.3 and you might need to configure some registry keys values to optimize the savesets recall from collections.

  1. So please run the acpidump above twice, once when booted normally in ACPI mode, and once when booted with "acpi=off".
  2. Comment 31 Vincent Fortier 2007-09-13 08:07:26 UTC Created attachment 12819 [details] dmesg - vanilla 2.6.22.6 + patch from bug #8630 This seems to solve all the problem!
  3. MRS will continue trying to pick up this request.
  4. Type EVSVR and press enter 4.
  5. Distribution: Debian Sarge 3.1 + custom kernel Hardware Environment: HP XW6200 Software Environment: Problem Description: If I'm booting normally I'm getting theses errors in dmesg (using either a 2.6.16.x or 2.6.17.11):
  6. Solved!
  7. With this patch, the kernel should prefer the 32-bit address when there is a mis-match with the 64-bit address in the FADT.
  8. I hope this helps.

You also have the option of booting with "acpi=ht", which will disable ACPI on this machine, except for the early boot stuff which is necessary to enable HT. Close Sign In Print Article Products Article Languages Subscribe to this Article Manage your Subscriptions Problem When Enterprise Vault verified the existence of large SIS part files, warning events 7110 (An I was sure the site was US English – so tried to provision and got this error (Event ID 7110) Failed to connect Proj_Published to PWA because the language of the They are just alpha/numeric sequences...

Attachment Products Subscribe to Article Search Survey Did this article answer your question or resolve your issue? http://blackplanetsupport.com/event-id/windows-event-log-event-id-1000.html Mainly due to the libata changes which implies a lot of modifications to our local configuration. Just to add a fe things, this is running a 32bit kernel (although the cpu's are probably able to run 64bit). This appears to be either a bug in the actual FADT as presented by the BIOS, or some code is writing on the FADT.

Refer DumpSaveset command using EVSVR Article URL http://www.symantec.com/docs/HOWTO37697 0 Kudos Reply Im in a bit deep here so bare EVGarrison Level 5 ‎03-05-2013 06:38 AM Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Comment 9 Vincent Fortier 2006-09-07 09:25:14 UTC Just tell me how to do so and I'll try to gather the info for you. In the archive box, choose the Mailbox that was reported in the event 10. Source View solution in original post 0 Kudos Reply Accepted Solution!

I’ll document the errors first, and then give details of the cause: The first error from the Application event log – Event ID 7110 Failed to connect Proj_Published to PWA because Mismatched GPE address. I'm willing to the gather this info but a hint would help!

Provisioning ‘PWA': Databases specified for site ‘ProjectServer' are as follows: Published: Name = ‘Proj_Published', State = Empty Draft: Name = ‘Proj_Draft', State = ProjectSchema Archive: Name = ‘Proj_Archive', State = ProjectSchema

Please Ignore the comment #37 and #35. Following item details are available: Mailbox = [xxx] Subject = [xxx] Original Location = [Inbox] Following sis part details are available: FPDistinctionByte = [255] FPHashPart1 = Job is waiting for resource reservation. If this solves the problem can this patch be sent to the stable-team for the next 2.6.22.7 release ?

Monitor the events for couple of days and update the case with results. Error Message Type:  WarningEvent: 7110Source:    Enterprise VaultCategory: Storage File WatchComputer: EVSERVER01.testdomain.localDescription: An invalid SIS part was encountered while doing watch file scan. In order to proceed with the attach operation you must assign a new ID to this database. have a peek here Monitor the events for couple of days and update the case with results. 0 Kudos Reply THanks for updating the post TypoProne Level 6 Partner Accredited Certified ‎09-06-2013 05:51 AM

Following further information is available. I've tried to dump the memory region but it did not worked (ran exactly this command string): dd if=/dev/mem skip=$[0xbfff52ac] bs=1c count=244 2> /dev/null > fadt.bin The output file was having Failed to provision site PWA with error: Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Administration.ProvisionException: Failed to provision databases. --> Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Administration.ProvisionException: Language of database does not match language of site at Microsoft.Office.Project.Server.Administration.PsiServiceApplication.CheckMatchingLcid(Int32 lcid, String connectionString, String siteName) Partition Name = Exchange Ptn1 VaultStoreEntryId = 16015A7981113D14DB2558EB2F56A1C8D1210000evserver1 ParentTransactionID = B13B152FD8A7D87A1ABD7AC147B84C71 Invalid Reason = Verification failed for sis part when post processing Saveset with TID = [D09FF3461A987B5936EFCF5B4466A6A1].

Here is one cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 3200.728 Obviously the only way to resolve this is to restore the correct databases.