Mar 29 23:11:44 racoon: ERROR: such policy already exists. It's mostly about limitations in PF_KEY API and there's no easy way to fix that for ipsec-tools (would require implementation of Linux specific Netlink XFRM API). - Timo SourceForge About Site Not sure if negotiation would actually fail in that circumstance, but it would make sense if it did. share|improve this answer answered Dec 9 '14 at 17:38 imperium2335 10816 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign Check This Out
I don't think cmpid source and cmpid target should be the same? ike 0: IKEv1 exchange=Quick id=bbae340e1df2eeac/287a9032ff1c3b3b:95f810ea len=428 ike 0: in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ike 0:IKE61_0:12042:896294: responder received first quick-mode message ike 0:IKE61_0:12042: dec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 ike 0:IKE61_0:12042:896294: peer proposal is: peer:17:220.127.116.11-18.104.22.168:68, me:17:0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255:67 ike 0:IKE61_0:12042:IKE62:896294: trying give up to get IPsec-SA due to time up to wait. hope this answer can fix your issue :) share|improve this answer edited Dec 8 '14 at 17:16 answered Dec 8 '14 at 16:42 zulkarnaen 115 add a comment| up vote 0
It does NOT encapsulate IP header. Does agreement on how securely the devices are going to be, how they exchange keys. Am I missing something here? anyway replace it: 10.0.0.0/16 10.0.0.1/32 proto=any dir=in Logged hoba Hero Member Posts: 5837 Karma: +8/-0 What was the problem to this solution again?
If I remove all policies from Redhat except these: spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 ubuntu tcp -P out ipsec esp/transport//require; spdadd ubuntu 0.0.0.0/0 tcp -P in ipsec esp/transport//require; It works. So when you ping the remote from ASA, it will be WAN IP.You can add the following entry in your ACL to see if it worksaccess-list acl_encrypt permit ip host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Thank you very much, that has solved the problem. Give Up To Get Ipsec-sa Due To Time Up To Wait Please don't fill out this field.
See More 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings) Log in or register to post comments rga-rga-rga Thu, 12/16/2010 - 15:40 The reason why I want to do So why is phase 2 failing? It would appear that I have something wrong in my phase 2 configs, but like I said before, everything seems to match up. Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter: I agree to receive quotes, newsletters and other information from sourceforge.net and its partners regarding IT services and products.
Should enriched doughs pass the windowpane test? Failed To Get Sainfo Re: Ipsec errors please help need this up Monday « Reply #2 on: March 30, 2008, 06:05:27 pm » That looks like some settings mismatch to me. I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time. I am not sure since this traffic is initiated from ASA itself.
On MikroTik side (22.214.171.124) I set up routing (line 2):[[emailprotected]] /ip route> print Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, C - connect, S - static, r - Please don't fill out this field. Racoon Failed To Get Proposal For Responder That provides data integrity and source authentication: the data must come from an authentic source, one that knows the hash key. Mikrotik Ipsec No Policy Found Racoon Start in debug mode: racoon -F -dd -v Configuring racoon.conf Section: 'remote' Required options: exchange_mode, proposal Useful options: ph1id (links with sainfo by correspinding remoteid) proposal section Optimal values: encryption_algorithm
FortiOS 5.4.3 is out Install Office 2016 is blocked All FAQs There is no record available at this moment current community blog chat Server Fault Meta Server Fault your his comment is here It might give us some clue. I've broken my new MacBook Pro (with touchbar) like this, do I have to repair it? ike 0:IKE61: no IP assignment method defined ike 0:IKE61:12042: responder: aggressive mode get 1st message... Error: Failed To Pre-process Ph2 Packet
If it helps, here are the relevant portions of my configs:RouterOS:Code: Select all/ip ipsec proposal
set default auth-algorithms=sha1 disabled=yes enc-algorithms=3des lifetime=30m name=default pfs-group=modp1024
add auth-algorithms=sha1 disabled=no enc-algorithms=3des lifetime=1d name=proposal1 pfs-group=modp1024
/ip Links: IPsec Simplified IPsec Simplified — Part 2 Diffie-Hellman key exchange About Diffie-Hellman Groups (performance) HMAC-SHA1 vs HMAC-SHA256 The price to pay for perfect-forward secrecy (performance) Contact GitHub API Training Shop It would be great if someone could give me a hint.. < Message edited by snobs -- 11/15/2013 12:19:35 AM > #1 4 Replies Related Threads emnoc Expert Member Total Posts http://blackplanetsupport.com/failed-to/ipsec-racoon-failed-to-get-sainfo.html share|improve this answer answered Dec 2 '14 at 15:11 drookie 4,3111614 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote i have the same similar issue with you, Failed negotiation on phase
View SPD table: setkey -DP SAD: Security Association Database Determines which algorithms to be used for specific IPSec traffic. Mar 29 23:26:56 racoon: ERROR: failed to get proposal for responder. Any comment or advice is welcome (not only to the issue)!ASA Version 8.0(3)!hostname asadomain-name company.localenable password ***** encryptednames!interface Vlan1 nameif inside security-level 100 ip address 172.27.0.1 255.255.240.0!interface Vlan2 nameif outside security-level
Dec 2 08:41:03 racoon: ERROR: failed to get sainfo. I just need a tunnel between the two PFsense firewalls in order to connect the two and make it as one network. ike 0:IKE61_0:12042: sending XAUTH request ike 0:IKE61_0:12042: enc BBAE340E1DF2EEAC287A9032FF1C3B3B0810060145C2B70C000000740E000044A9C39D7658849E8CC226C253B91855263123AF9AE2BECB05014AC7EFBFF7F4B0D63DEC479726857D511F957214E8BDE7DE22299894B152129B28759DE58AEE0F000000140100DEBFC088000040890000408A0000 ike 0:IKE61_0:12042: out BBAE340E1DF2EEAC287A9032FF1C3B3B0810060145C2B70C0000007C6D1D4A8D25E0D077C3DCD8868ACF74C9242249345C3CF7E59DBBD70C2BB3C8E510D5E91DEDB665F4560F71614653B8EA283741539FCFA23B7F0C8FCD6A339976BB5CBFC6A5253C2CC39F61EA453B8132B4229AE0F0766BDCC6A82EA0B60EA915 ike 0:IKE61_0:12042: sent IKE msg (cfg_send): 2001:f587:7ab1:f64::f1:500->2001:f587:7ab1:1222::f100:10952, len=124, id=bbae340e1df2eeac/287a9032ff1c3b3b:45c2b70c ike 0:IKE61_0:12042: peer has not completed XAUTH exchange ike anyway replace it: 172.16.10.1/32 172.16.0.0/16 proto=any dir=out Second Box ErrorsMar 29 23:27:16 racoon: ERROR: failed to pre-process packet.
Reload to refresh your session. [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] (racoon 317) Re: [linux 2.6] racoon not initiating sa, "failed to get sainfo" To: [email protected] Subject: (racoon 317) Taxiing with one engine: Is engine #1 always used or do they switch? Mar 29 23:18:13 racoon: [Name]: INFO: initiate new phase 2 negotiation: 98.165.!.!<=>66.93.!.! Mar 29 23:12:55 racoon: [Name]: ERROR: 126.96.36.199 give up to get IPsec-SA due to time up to wait. http://blackplanetsupport.com/failed-to/failed-to-get-ipsec-sa-configuration-for-netgear.html You signed in with another tab or window.
So you would only use AH for things like placing small orders across the Internet, assuming that does not need to be done confidentially. ike 0:IKE61:12042: encapsulation = IKE/none ike 0:IKE61:12042: type=OAKLEY_ENCRYPT_ALG, val=AES_CBC.